View Single Post
  #5  
Old June 25th, 2009, 07:50 AM
neutronnorman's Avatar
neutronnorman neutronnorman is online now
ADBB Advocate

Atkins Phase: OWL Rung 4
S/C/G Weights: (~265 pre Atkins, around Mar-Apr '09) 245 at the start of induction (May 24, 2009)/189/irrevelant
 
Join Date: May 24, 2009
Location: Cydonia, Mars
Posts: 839
Rep Power: 16
neutronnorman has much to be proud ofneutronnorman has much to be proud ofneutronnorman has much to be proud ofneutronnorman has much to be proud ofneutronnorman has much to be proud ofneutronnorman has much to be proud ofneutronnorman has much to be proud ofneutronnorman has much to be proud ofneutronnorman has much to be proud of
Default Re: Fat pounds vs Muscle pounds

Quote:
Originally Posted by FwL View Post
What they're saying is .... you could lose a bunch of fat... gain a little muscle... and come out weighing the same, because....


"Muscle wieghs more than fat."



* I make no claim as to the veracity of such a statement. I'm just filling in the missing details.

Wrong, muscle mass weighs exactly the same as fat mass. The volume is different. It's like one pound of feathers weighs the same as one pound of lead. The volume of space one pound of feathers occupies is much larger than the volume of space one pound of lead occupies. It's all about density being a function, f(V), of volume.
__________________
Me, at 195 lb. September 24, 2009. It's 5:30 a.m. and can't wait to hit the coffee.